Love Actually actress had to wear dead woman’s clothes after £65k con

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info

Love Actually star Meg Wynn Owen, real name was Margaret Wright, was conned out of £65,000 from her account by a so-called friend. The stolen lump sum of money resulted in the actress being left with a £1,750.12 overdraft which was later written off by the bank.

A court also heard how the penniless star had to wear clothes from dead residents at her care home.

Brian Malam, 60, had been put in charge of Meg’s finances back in 2014 due to her declining health as she suffered from dementia.

Without permission, he then took thousands of pounds from her savings through a combination of bank transfers.

Brian, who previously pleaded guilty to fraud while occupying a position of trust, was sentenced to two years and eight months at Cardiff Crown Court.

He will serve up to half of the sentence in custody before being released on licence.

During the sentencing, the court heard how he stole the money over a period of four years.

He and Margaret are said to have been friends for quite some time.

Prosecutor Abigail Jackson said the alarm was raised by her bank when they spotted suspicious activity on her account.

She told the court: “Mrs Wright became terribly upset about it. The matter was then reported to the police in September 2020.

“That’s how the investigation with the police started and the matter came to light.”

After being arrested, Brian admitted he had taken the money, but that he had intended to pay it back.

He went on to say he had spent the cash on materials he needed for work.

Wilko Johnson, Game of Thrones star and Dr. Feelgood icon, dies at 75 [RIP]
Madonna, 64, spills out of busty corset as she shares Sex book news [PICTURED]
Heidi Klum runs into clothing disaster before date night with husband [REVEALED]

Judge Paul Hodson told him: “The position was that you were taking money from her bank account in significant funds and either transferring it into your own account or spending it directly.

“As time went on you simply continued in what you were doing known full well the money would not be repaid realistically.

“Your victim had to be dressed in clothes that belonged to deceased residents of her care home due to insufficient funds.

“She was reduced by your actions towards her.”

More to follow…

Source: Read Full Article